Dynamite Darts is the kind of service where members stick around. David’s tipster CV speaks for itself — highly profitable, well-structured, and easy to follow with clear match winner and handicap bets. His detailed write-ups also show where the value lies, helping members understand the logic behind bets.
In this post, we’ll dive into:
📉 The expected drawdowns and why they’re part of the journey
💰 How much bankroll you need to follow with confidence
🔍 What the long-term outlook looks like through Monte Carlo simulations
Let’s break it down and see why so many choose to follow Dynamite Darts.
🧠 Dynamite Darts:
Betting Style at a Glance
| Metric | Description |
|---|---|
| Sport | Darts |
| Avg Odds | 2.25 |
| Avg Stake | 1.5pts |
| ROI | 15% |
| Volume | 600 bets per year |
| Bookies | Bet365 + Other Soft Books |
This is a low volatility service with a proven long-term edge. The strike rate is close to 50% despite average odds above 2.0. Markets are mainstream and easy to catch close to advised odds.
📊 Simulation Summary – Full Sample (984 bets)
We ran 15 simulations based on David’s Bet Bots stats to model what might happen over his current sample of approximately 18 months – to give you a realistic view of what you can expect when following this service long-term.
🔎 Key Insights from the 18-Month Simulation:
💰 Profit: +221.85pts
That’s over 12pts/month — consistently positive returns without the major peaks and valleys.
🎯 Hit Rate: 50%
With half of the bets hitting, the results stay steady, balancing out the losing streaks over time.
📉 Typical Max Drawdown: ~26pts
That means a follower might face a losing patch of around 26pts, but with a 50-point bankroll, it’s manageable.
🚨 Worst-case dip observed: ~41pts
Even in the worst-run simulations, the drawdown stayed comfortably under 50pts, showing that even moderate drawdowns are rare. 14/15 simulations had drawdowns of 30pts or less.
🔐 Chance of success being random?
Just 0.002% — with such a low probability (1/50,000), it’s clear this level of profit isn’t due to luck.
📊 Risk vs Reward Ratio:
Profit is almost 9x bigger than the drawdown — great ratio here! Suggested Bankroll: 60–70pts
🧳 Suggested Bankroll: 50–60pts
With a highest drawdown of 40pts across 986 bets and a typical drawdown of 26pts in the 18-month sample, here’s the suggested approach:
- 50pts → Balanced, with enough room to absorb occasional dips.
- 60pts → Extra buffer for added peace of mind without wasting capital.
- Staking confidence → You can comfortably stake more on Dynamite Darts compared to higher-variance tipsters, while keeping the risk profile in check.
Dynamite Darts is a tipster that allows you to grow your bankroll steadily — without the stress.
🔐 Final Thoughts
This article likely understates just how good David’s Dynamite Dart is. His data of 10,000 private bets prior to joining the Bet Bots showed results entirely in line with what’s happened at Wadster, being amazingly strong year after year. The lowest ROI on a given year (2016-2023) was 7% – a great return.
It’s about as close as you’ll get to a risk-free investment on the Bet Bots if betting over a 12-month period, alongside Bonz. Both have the lowest bankroll recommendations for this ability to provide incredibly consistent growth, with risk reward ratios that stack the upside in members favour.
A service that long-term members are enthralled to be a part of ⬇️
Next Up: AI Lays 🐎
Quite a few of you have requested this one lately. What are the implications of a Laying service for drawdowns. Higher liabilities but equally a strike rate of over 80%. Where does the balance lie when setting a bankroll for a unique scenario like this? Find out in the next bankroll deep dive.
